Kirsten says our very own Harvey Levin needs to watch what he says on the podcast too … or, he and Geragos might end up being used as a grounds for appeal in this case!

As for whether it should be up to the defense to decide if they’re talking too much to the public and potentially poisoning their case, Kirsten says it’s actually unfair to the prosecutors … ’cause someone like Geragos could end up sabotaging his own client on accident.

The way Brown-Neil explains it, if Geragos is some sort of unofficial member of Diddy’s legal team — something he’s kept mum on so far — then by speaking out and biasing the jury in some way, he himself could be used in an ineffectiveness of counsel appeal.

So, if prosecutors are able to secure a conviction, they don’t want MG talking … because Diddy’s side could try to use something like that to appeal the decision.

Brown-Neil says prosecutors can’t just secure a conviction — they have to protect it once they get one too.

Kirsten also talks about how prosecutors are representing the public … so, the public has the right to hear them discuss the case when they can.